tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5480777122984305387.post8541432087141659485..comments2024-03-03T01:00:33.312-08:00Comments on Picked RAW Peeled: Revisiting Censorship: Where would you draw the line?Kevin Freitashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02900228510168448833noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5480777122984305387.post-65410530822097113392015-04-01T22:40:45.271-07:002015-04-01T22:40:45.271-07:00Dear Terri, Here is the response form Joe Nalven: ...Dear Terri, Here is the response form Joe Nalven: Please feel free to comment back. <br /><br />"As part of educational research and as a matter of opinion, one can use images and sounds under the fair use exception to copyright law, especially if one isn't reselling the art object. <br /><br />In this case, Lloyd's image - and the counterpoint image - serve an important part of a dialogue about race, politics and satire. This is not a closed system but one that invites a broad response. <br /><br />Perhaps as an academic, I am more open to the give-and-take of debate. In this sense, Terri Lloyd should respond about her intent about her original image and how she views the satirizing of the satirist. <br /><br />More commentary is better than narrowing the discussion about this social issue. The discussion should be a multi-faceted one."<br />Patriciahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09466326752758836872noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5480777122984305387.post-71634104915343629482015-03-31T00:46:52.587-07:002015-03-31T00:46:52.587-07:00Terri, I agree that all images used in bloggers th...Terri, I agree that all images used in bloggers that use images are not part of a specific report on an exhibition, should seek permission to use the image. I have asked Joe Nalven to respond to your comment. If we hear nothing from him, then I will be glad to remove the image from the report if that is that is your request. Do let us know. Patricia Frischer coordinator, SDVAN Patriciahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09466326752758836872noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5480777122984305387.post-9378014458977735962015-03-30T14:51:46.451-07:002015-03-30T14:51:46.451-07:00It would have been the professional thing to have ...It would have been the professional thing to have asked Terri Lloyd about using her image in this particular discourse. I believe that's the etiquette. Instead, she ended up finding it through an arbitrary google search. Terri Lloydhttp://terrilloyd.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5480777122984305387.post-13370452033382614852014-09-25T15:07:30.459-07:002014-09-25T15:07:30.459-07:00South African theater director Brett Bailey’s recr...South African theater director Brett Bailey’s recreation of a 19th-century human zoo has been cancelled in London after large protests outside the Barbican, where it was on view. The work, which features caged black actors, has been accused of being racist. “It became impossible for us to continue with the show because of the extreme nature of the protest and the serious threat to the safety of performers, audiences and staff,” read a statement released by the Barbican. “We find it profoundly troubling that such methods have been used to silence artists and performers and that audiences have been denied the opportunity to see this important work.”<br /><br />http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/24/a-racially-charged-exhibition-in-london-is-canceled-after-protests/?ref=design Patriciahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09466326752758836872noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5480777122984305387.post-57951003173934066302014-09-25T04:54:44.220-07:002014-09-25T04:54:44.220-07:00Great piece,Joe. Of course where public money is...Great piece,Joe. Of course where public money is involved in promoting or sponsoring art, or where public bodies have something to say about it, "censorship" issues come up big time.<br /><br />Both the NEA and HEH were hot beds for this as you know. I do generally think that publicly sponsored or administered art has more of a responsibility than the privates not to offend . That's sort of paradoxical, because it's only the publics that have to honor are any sort of first amendment type requirements. The privates in my view can do just about anything that falls short of hate speech , or violence , or anything else illegal that might go on in a gallery. I mean, you can't, turn a gallery into a brothel , or a betting parlour, and say that it's art. Irv Lefberghttp://iflphotogallery.com/#noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5480777122984305387.post-43935616602817492112014-09-22T05:11:38.268-07:002014-09-22T05:11:38.268-07:00Who decides? Censorship is just plain wrong. It is...Who decides? Censorship is just plain wrong. It is too often used by the ones with power to take voice away from those with none. The FBI closed down a work critical of Dubya during his reign of terror. Guilani waged war on Lehmans choice of Puss Christ for Sensation. One judge in a federal building disliked tilted arc enough to ultimately get it removed. I vote with my feet and my dollars. No need to censor the opposition. Diana Jeon's student workshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05297001942511958724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5480777122984305387.post-54171014372220293452014-09-20T22:18:36.635-07:002014-09-20T22:18:36.635-07:00Provocative and a conversation that warrants more ...Provocative and a conversation that warrants more discussion and Thought.Pasha Turleynoreply@blogger.com