by Kevin Freitas
Currently on view at the La Jolla Athenaeum Music & Arts library through May 7, 2011 is “hoy-yee-tah (joyita/small jewel)” presented by the San Diego Visual Arts Network (SDVAN) in conjunction with the 2010 San Diego Art Prize and featuring works by Einar and Jamex de la Torre and emerging artist Julio Orozco. I will be focusing primarily on the work of the de la Torre brothers in this review.
Currently on view at the La Jolla Athenaeum Music & Arts library through May 7, 2011 is “hoy-yee-tah (joyita/small jewel)” presented by the San Diego Visual Arts Network (SDVAN) in conjunction with the 2010 San Diego Art Prize and featuring works by Einar and Jamex de la Torre and emerging artist Julio Orozco. I will be focusing primarily on the work of the de la Torre brothers in this review.
Orozco for his part primarily suffers from a poor installation. Many of his pieces are sandwiched in between larger works of the brothers, put in a corner or left on a window sill in an incoherent and random manner. As a viewer, it makes you question at times whose work is whose. I would have liked to see a more intimate and concentrated showing of his photographs and digital prints, and at least partially isolated from the rest of the exhibit.
That being said, Orozco didn’t do himself any favors either with a selection of works that appear to be fragments of a larger idea. Presented individually, they seem incongruent and unintelligible. Thankfully, the series "Untitled comic pieces from the project ‘HISTORIOGRAMAS’ " save this exhibition from completely disappearing. Their muted colors and eerie out-of-focus atmospheres are strong; they beckon the viewer like some bejeweled Siren. A more detailed account of Orozco’s work can be found on the SDVAN website or here.Julio Orozco - Untitled comic pieces from the project ‘HISTORIOGRAMAS' |
Einar and Jamex de la Torre
Admittedly, I have limited familiarity with the work of Einar and Jamex de la Torre. Why the work of such popular and prolific artists has evaded my radar is perhaps a question to be explored. Is it that the work does not speak to me personally, or is the work itself simply mute? At this point, I can only draw upon the cultural references and knowledge I possess for the basis of my critique. My apathy however in attempting this review disturbs me; I would like to know why. Consider this essay then as a response to that ‘why’. More chum for the literary waters if you will. It’s a bit self-indulgent but I believe absolutely crucial (the process of discovery at least) to a better understanding of their work and its intentions. And if through a purely quizzical approach I succeed, then that in itself has its own rewards.